Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , premises considered, this Court hereby resolves to: 1. DISMISS the BDO's Complaint for Interpleader due to CBC-TAMG's lack of legal capacity to be sued and for lack of cause of action; 2. DISMISS CBC-TAMG's cross-claims against BDO and Primark for lack of legal capacity to sue and for lack of cause of action; and, 3. DISMISS the respective counterclaims of the parties.
WHEREFORE , premises considered, this Court hereby resolves to: 1. DISMISS the BDO's Complaint for Interpleader due to CBC-TAMG's lack of legal capacity to be sued and for lack of cause of action; 2. DISMISS CBC-TAMG's cross-claims against BDO and Primark for lack of legal capacity to sue and for lack of cause of action; and, 3. DISMISS the respective counterclaims of the parties. As a result of the above, CBC-TAMG's application for a Writ of Preliminary Injunction is now rendered moot. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 253186 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. WU JIAN CAI AND JIANG HUO ZAO, ACCUSED, CHEN JUNYUE, ACCUSED-.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 253186 -
CaseG.R. No. 195905 -
G.R. No. 195905 -
CaseG.R. No. 261472 - NATIONAL FOOD AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ATTY. MA. THERESA S. VILLAFUERTE, CPA, IN HER CAPACITY AS DEPARTMENT MANAGER OF NFA LEGAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, VS. CITY GOVERNMENT OF TAGUM, CITY ASSESSOR AND CITY TREASURER OF TAGUM, PROVINCE OF DAVAO DEL NORTE.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court
G.R. No. 261472 -