Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , premises considered, the decision dated March 16, 1998 rendered by the court a quo is hereby AFFIRMED with costs against the appellant (herein petitioner). SO ORDERED.
accordingly sentenced her to suffer imprisonment and pay fine and to indemnify private complainant, thus: In Crim. Case No. 94-03-226, one (1) year imprisonment and to pay a fine of P26,500.00 with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, to indemnify the complainant the amount of P26,500.00 and to pay the cost; In Crim. Case No. 94-03-227, one (1) year imprisonment and to pay a fine of P28,000.00 with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, to indemnify the complainant the amount of P28,000.00 and to pay the cost; In Crim. Case No. 94-03-228, one (1) year imprisonment and to pay a fine of P21,500.00 with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, to indemnify the complainant the amount of P21,500.00 and to pay the cost; In Crim. Case No. 94-03-229, one (1) year imprisonment and to pay a fine of P20,000.00 with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, to indemnify the complainant the amount of P20,000.00 and to pay the cost; In Crim. Case No. 94-03-230, one (1) year imprisonment and to pay a fine of P21,500.00 with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, to indemnify the complainant the amount of P21,500.00 and to pay the cost; In Crim. Case No. 94-03-231, one (1) year imprisonment and to pay a fine of P21,500.00 with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, to indemnify the complainant the amount of P21,500.00 and to pay the cost; In Crim. Case No. 94-03-232, one (1) year imprisonment and to pay a fine of P21,500.00 with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, to indemnify the complainant the amount of P21,500.00 and to pay the cost; and In Crim. Case No. 94-03-233, one (1) year imprisonment and to pay a fine of P22,500.00 with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, to indemnify the complainant the amount of P22,500.00 and to pay the cost. [2] Unable to accept the verdict of guilt, petitioner went on appeal to the CA whereat her appellate recourse was docketed as CA-G.R. CR NO. 22180 . In the herein assailed Decision dated June 28, 2000, the appellate court affirmed that of the trial court: WHEREFORE , premises considered, the decision dated March 16, 1998 rendered by the court a quo is hereby AFFIRMED with costs against the appellant (herein petitioner). SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 165884 - CIELITO R. GAN, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 165884 -
CaseG.R. No. 121179 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. ANTONINE B. SALEY A.K.A.
G.R. No. 121179 -
Case*G.R. No. 224212 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. ROMEO DE CASTRO DE GUZMAN, ACCUSED-.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 224212 -