Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the premises considered, Judgment is rendered in these cases as follows: In Criminal Case No. 03-4031, finding accused Rolly Soriaga y Sto. Domingo GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt of Violation of Section 5, Art. II, RA 9165, and sentencing him to suffer the penalty of life imprisonment and to pay a fine in the amount of P500,000.
WHEREFORE, the premises considered, Judgment is rendered in these cases as follows: In Criminal Case No. 03-4031, finding accused Rolly Soriaga y Sto. Domingo GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt of Violation of Section 5, Art. II, RA 9165, and sentencing him to suffer the penalty of life imprisonment and to pay a fine in the amount of P500,000.00. Said accused shall be given credit for the period of his preventive detention. In Criminal Case No. 03-5007, acquitting the said accused Rolly Soriaga y Sto. Domingo from the charge of Violation of Section 15, Art. II, R.A. No. 9165, upon a reasonable doubt. It is further ordered that the dangerous drugs subject of Criminal Case No. 03-4031 be transmitted to the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) for the latter's appropriate disposition. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 199403 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. GOMER S. CLIMACO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 199403 -
CaseG.R. No. 198796 - THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. NICOLAS LARA III Y AGATEP AND RANDY ALCAYDE Y MAGUNDAYAO, ACCUSED, ABDUL MAMMAD Y MACDIROL, LADGER TAMPOY Y BAGAYAD AND HATA SARIOL Y MADDAS, ACCUSED-.
G.R. No. 198796 -
CaseG.R. No. 253186 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. WU JIAN CAI AND JIANG HUO ZAO, ACCUSED, CHEN JUNYUE, ACCUSED-.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 253186 -