Back to Search
JurisprudenceA.M. No. CA-02-33

A.M. No. CA-02-33 - TAN TIAC CHIONG, COMPLAINANT, VS. HON. RODRIGO V. COSICO, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS.

En Banc

Cited Laws

RA 747RA 325RA 723RA 397RA 501,RA 154,RA 121RA 718RA 411,RA 444RA 268RA 5RA 222RA 235RA 423RA 654,RA 60RA 181RA 606,RA 541
View Original SourceCompare
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing, the complaint is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing, the complaint is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

A.M. NO. RTJ-05-1898 (FORMERLY OCA IPI NO. 04-2037-RTJ) - CHARLTON TAN, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE ABEDNEGO O. ADRE.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

A.M. NO. RTJ-05-1898

Case

A.C. No. 7910 - WEN MING W CHEN, A.K.A. DOMINGO TAN, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. F.D. NICOLAS B. PICHAY. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

A.C. No. 7910

Case

A.M. No. RTJ-04-1887 (Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 03-1654-RTJ) - JUDGE CAROLINE B. PANGAN, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE CLIFTON U. GANAY AND JUDGE SAMUEL R. MARTIRES, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCHES 31 AND 32, RESPECTIVELY, AGOO, LA UNION.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

A.M. No. RTJ-04-1887