Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the petition is DENIED . The Decision of the Court of Appeals dated 21 July 2004 and its Resolution dated 10 June 2005 in CA-G.R. SP No.
WHEREFORE , the petition is DENIED . The Decision of the Court of Appeals dated 21 July 2004 and its Resolution dated 10 June 2005 in CA-G.R. SP No. 76396 are AFFIRMED. Costs against petitioner. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 149617 - JUDGE MARIANO JOAQUIN S. MACIAS, VS. MARGIE CORPUS MACIAS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 149617 -
CaseG.R. No. 168903 - MA. ANA CONSUELO A.S. MADRIGAL, VS. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNDERSECRETARY MA. MERCEDITAS N. GUTIERREZ, CELESTINO M. PALMA III, AND HELEN T. CHUA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 168903 -
CaseG.R. No. 166819 - SPOUSES OSCAR ARCENAS[1] AND DOLORES ARCENAS, VS. QUEEN CITY DEVELOPMENT BANK AND COURT OF APPEALS (NINETEENTH DIVISION).D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 166819 -