Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the Petition for Review on Certiorari is DENIED . The Decision dated June 21, 2018 in CA-G.R. CV No.
WHEREFORE , the Petition for Review on Certiorari is DENIED . The Decision dated June 21, 2018 in CA-G.R. CV No. 04462-MIN, is hereby AFFIRMED . Accordingly, the Complaint for Cancellation of Decree filed by the Republic of the Philippines, represented by the Department of Transportation and Communications against Guillerma Lamaclamac in MC Case No. 2008-736 is DISMISSED . SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 194190 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS (DPWH), VS. SPOUSES FRANCISCO R. LLAMAS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 194190 -
CaseG.R. No. 167120 - RODOLFO V. FRANCISCO, VS. EMILIANA M. ROJAS, AND THE LEGITIMATE HEIRS OF JOSE A. ROJAS, NAMELY: JOSE FERDINAND M. ROJAS II, ROLANDO M. ROJAS, JOSE M. ROJAS, JR., CARMELITA ROJAS-JOSE, VICTOR M. ROJAS, AND LOURDES M. ROJAS, ALL REPRESENTED BY JOSE FERDINAND M. ROJAS II.D E C I S I O
G.R. No. 167120 -
CaseG.R. No. 184879 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES (DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS), VS. CITY OF MANDALUYONG.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 184879 -