Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the imposition of a franchise tax under Sec. 2.09 Article D of Ordinance No. 56 otherwise known as the Revenue Code of the City of San Pablo, is declared ineffective and null and void insofar as the plaintiff MERALCO is concerned for being violative of Republic Act No.
WHEREFORE, the imposition of a franchise tax under Sec. 2.09 Article D of Ordinance No. 56 otherwise known as the Revenue Code of the City of San Pablo, is declared ineffective and null and void insofar as the plaintiff MERALCO is concerned for being violative of Republic Act No. 2340, PD 551, and Republic Act No. 7160 and the defendants are ordered to refund to the plaintiff the amount of ONE MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY SEVEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN & 67/100 (P1,857,711.67) and such other amounts as may have been paid by the plaintiff under said Revenue Ordinance No. 56 after the filing of the complaint. [4] SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 166408 - QUEZON CITY AND THE CITY TREASURER OF QUEZON CITY, VS. ABS-CBN BROADCASTING CORPORATION.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 166408 -
CaseVS. CITY OF DAVAO AND ADELAIDA B. BARCELONA, IN HER CAPACITY AS THE CITY
G.R. No. 143867 -
CaseG.R. No. 149179 - PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., VS. CITY OF BACOLOD, FLORENTINO T. GUANCO, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE CITY TREASURER OF BACOLOD CITY, AND ANTONIO G. LACZI, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE CITY LEGAL OFFICER OF BACOLOD CITY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 149179 -