Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is rendered ordering the defendants to pay [China Bank], jointly and severally, the following: [T]he amount of £29,258,179.81 representing the deficiency claim as of August 10, 1998 plus penalties accruing thereafter at the rate of 2% per month until fully paid; 5% of the total amount due as Attorney's [F]ees; Expenses of litigation and cost of suit. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is rendered ordering the defendants to pay [China Bank], jointly and severally, the following: [T]he amount of £29,258,179.81 representing the deficiency claim as of August 10, 1998 plus penalties accruing thereafter at the rate of 2% per month until fully paid; 5% of the total amount due as Attorney's [F]ees; Expenses of litigation and cost of suit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 187678 - SPOUSES IGNACIO F. JUICO AND ALICE P. JUICO, VS. CHINA BANKING CORPORATION.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 187678 -
CaseG.R. No. 193890 - ESTANISLAO AND AFRICA SINAMBAN, VS. CHINA BANKING CORPORATION.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 193890 -
CaseG.R. No. 217044 - SPOUSES RAINIER JOSE M. YULO AND JULIET L. YULO, VS. BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 217044 -