Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the Motion for Reconsideration of complainants is GRANTED. The Decision dated January 31, 2005 is SET ASIDE and VACATED, and NEW ONE entered; (a) declaring respondent Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils., Inc. as the employer of complainants; (b) finding complainants to have been dismissed illegally; (c) ordering Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, Inc.
WHEREFORE, the Motion for Reconsideration of complainants is GRANTED. The Decision dated January 31, 2005 is SET ASIDE and VACATED, and NEW ONE entered; (a) declaring respondent Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils., Inc. as the employer of complainants; (b) finding complainants to have been dismissed illegally; (c) ordering Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, Inc. to reinstate complainants to their former positions as regular employees without loss of seniority rights and with other privileges and with payment of full backwages from the date of dismissal on June 3, 2002 until actual reinstatement; (d) declaring Romac Services & Trading Co. Inc. and Rogelio S. Cunanan General Services to be engaged in labor-only contracting; and (e) ordering respondent Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils. Inc. to pay attorney's fees at 10% of the total award. The other claims are dismissed for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. Nos. 275357 & 275955 - EDUARDO V. MACALINO, DANILO TOLENTINO, CRISANTO TABAGO, AND NOEL TAGARO, VS. COCA-COLA BEVERAGES PHILIPPINES, INC.,** MACSLINK PSV-SERVICES INC., AND THE REDSYSTEMS COMPANY, INC..D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. Nos. 275357
CaseG.R. No. 162583 - ALBERTO NAVARRO, VS. COCA-COLA BOTTLERS PHILS., INC., MANUEL GARCIA AND RUSTUM ALEJANDRINO.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 162583 -
CaseG.R. No. 120466 - COCA COLA BOTTLERS PHILS., INC., VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND RAMON B. CANONICATO. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 120466 -