TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the petition is GRANTED . The assailed Resolution of the Court of Appeals dated 12 November 1998 giving due course to the petition for annulment of judgment, and its Resolution dated 4 May 2000 denying petitioner's motion for reconsideration, are SET ASIDE . The decision of the RTC-Br. 114, Pasay City, dated 27 June 1989, is REINSTATED .
WHEREFORE, the petition is GRANTED . The assailed Resolution of the Court of Appeals dated 12 November 1998 giving due course to the petition for annulment of judgment, and its Resolution dated 4 May 2000 denying petitioner's motion for reconsideration, are SET ASIDE . The decision of the RTC-Br. 114, Pasay City, dated 27 June 1989, is REINSTATED . SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 167838 - JOSE V. TOLEDO, GLENN PADIERNOS AND DANILO PADIERNOS, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, LOURDES RAMOS, ENRIQUE RAMOS, ANTONIO RAMOS, MILAGROS RAMOS AND ANGELITA RAMOS AS HEIRS OF SOCORRO RAMOS, GUILLERMO PABLO, PRIMITIVA CRUZ AND A.R.C. MARKETING CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, ALBE
G.R. No. 167838 -
CaseLILY C. LOPEZ, VS. LOLITO S. LOPEZ, MA.
G.R. Nos. 254957-58 -
CaseG.R. No. 145276 - ROLANDO AGULTO, MAXIMA AGULTO AND CECILLE TENORIO, PRESENT: VS. WILLIAM Z. TECSON.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 145276 -