Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, respondent Judge Rustico D. Paderanga is hereby found GUILTY of gross ignorance of the law for, which he is fined P20,000.00; and undue delay in resolving a motion and in deciding an appeal, for which he is fined P15,000.00 with a STERN WARNING that a more severe penalty will be meted out for the commission of similar offense in the future.
WHEREFORE, respondent Judge Rustico D. Paderanga is hereby found GUILTY of gross ignorance of the law for, which he is fined P20,000.00; and undue delay in resolving a motion and in deciding an appeal, for which he is fined P15,000.00 with a STERN WARNING that a more severe penalty will be meted out for the commission of similar offense in the future. SO ORDERED.
A.M. No. RTJ-08-2123 (Formerly OCA-I.P.I. No. 07-2679-RTJ) - ALFREDO J. LAGAMON, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE RUSTICO D. PADERANGA, RTC, BRANCH 28, MAMBAJAO, CAMIGUIN.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. RTJ-08-2123
CaseA.M. NO. RTJ-06-1969 (FORMERLY OCA IPI NO. 05-2159-RTJ) - ATTY. HUGOLINO V. BALAYON, JR., COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE OSCAR E. DINOPOL, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 24, KORONADAL CITY.
A.M. NO. RTJ-06-1969
CaseA.M. No. MTJ-07-1670 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 06-1822-MTJ) - ATTY. RODERICK M. SANTOS AND ALEXANDER ANDRES COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE LAURO BERNARDO, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, BOCAUE, BULACAN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. MTJ-07-1670