Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, judgment is hereby rendered dismissing [respondent's] [c]omplaint for lack of merit. On the other hand, finding preponderance of evidence to sustain [petitioner's] counterclaim, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of [petitioner] ordering [respondent] to pay the former: The unpaid balance of the consideration for [petitioner's] services in [the project] in the amount of P2,023,867.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, judgment is hereby rendered dismissing [respondent's] [c]omplaint for lack of merit. On the other hand, finding preponderance of evidence to sustain [petitioner's] counterclaim, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of [petitioner] ordering [respondent] to pay the former: The unpaid balance of the consideration for [petitioner's] services in [the project] in the amount of P2,023,867.25 with legal interest from the date of demand until fully paid; Compensatory damages in the amount of US$1,665,260 or its peso equivalent at the current foreign exchange rate representing lost rental income due only as of July 1997 and the accrued lost earnings from then on until the date of actual payment, with legal interest from the date of demand until fully paid; and Attorney's fees in the amount of P100,000 as acceptance fee, P1,000 appearance fee per hearing and 25% of the total amount awarded to [petitioner]. With costs against the [respondent]. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 174149 - J. TIOSEJO INVESTMENT CORP., VS. SPOUSES BENJAMIN AND ELEANOR ANG.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 174149 -
CaseG.R. No. 181842 - METROPOLITAN BANK AND TRUST CO. AND SOLIDBANK CORPORATION, VS. BERNARDITA H. PEREZ, REPRESENTED BY HER ATTORNEY-IN-FACT PATRIA H. PEREZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 181842 -
CaseG.R. No. 218778 - RODOLFO N. PADRIGON, VS. BENJAMIN E. PALMERO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 218778 -