Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court finds a preponderance of evidence in favor of plaintiffs and against the defendants and hereby orders said defendants: "a) To vacate the premises in question and surrender the possession thereof to plaintiffs; "b) To pay plaintiffs, jointly and severally the following amounts: "1. P5,000.00 - actual expenses for the repair and renovation of the damaged portion of the building; "2. P5,000.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court finds a preponderance of evidence in favor of plaintiffs and against the defendants and hereby orders said defendants: "a) To vacate the premises in question and surrender the possession thereof to plaintiffs; "b) To pay plaintiffs, jointly and severally the following amounts: "1. P5,000.00 - actual expenses for the repair and renovation of the damaged portion of the building; "2. P5,000.00 - reasonable rental value of the premises in question per month from the filing of the complaint until the subject property is returned to plaintiffs; "3. P10,000.00 - for attorneys fees and litigation expenses. "c) To pay the costs of the suit. "SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 147958 - AIDA LUGAYAN, RONA LUGAYAN AND ARTURO LUGAYAN, VS. SPOUSES CORAZON AND ANTONIO TIZON.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 147958 -
CaseG.R. Nos. 150820-21 - SPOUSES ANTONIO AND GENOVEVA BALANON-ANICETE AND SPOUSES ANDRES AND FILOMENA BALANON-MANANQUIL, VS. PEDRO BALANON (REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL HEIR JEAN BALANON QUIAMBAO).DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. Nos. 150820-21 -
CaseG.R. No. 227411 - TERESITA DAYANDAYAN, YOLLY D. LAGUNA, CLARA "CARING" TALLE, MR. & MRS. RODRIGO RIOS, AND MR. & MRS. REDEN BIGNAY, VS. SPOUSES EDUARDO P. ROJAS AND ENRIQUITA A. ROJAS.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 227411 -