Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the petition is DENIED. The Decision of respondent Court of Appeals dated 26 September 1995 sustaining the Resolution of the Prosecution and Enforcement Department of the Securities and Exchange Commission dated 21 May 1992 as well as the SEC En Banc Orders dated 11 July 1994 and 3 March 1995 is AFFIRMED. Costs against petitioners. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE , the petition is DENIED. The Decision of respondent Court of Appeals dated 26 September 1995 sustaining the Resolution of the Prosecution and Enforcement Department of the Securities and Exchange Commission dated 21 May 1992 as well as the SEC En Banc Orders dated 11 July 1994 and 3 March 1995 is AFFIRMED. Costs against petitioners. SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 122202 -
G.R. NO. 122202 -
CaseSY CHIN, SY HEN, TANG TUBI, TANG ANDRES, TANG FELINO, NIEVES KE TEK TANG, ANNIE KE TEK TANG, PENNIE CHUA TANG, LENIE TANG, ZENNIE KE TEK TANG, FELICIA KE TEK TANG, ONG SO HUA, JUDY ALONZO, EDUARDO ALONZO AND ALFREDO ALONZO, VS. THE COURT OF APPEALS, TANG CHING HENG & CO., TANG CHIN HENG AND WILLIAM
G.R. No. 136233 -
CaseG.R. NO. 139448 - JACINTO GALANG, GREGORIA GALANG AND MARISSA GALANG, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, INES CAMAGANAKAN, ANTONIO CAMAGANAKAN, MARITA CAMAGANAKAN AND BELINDA CAMAGANAKAN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 139448 -