Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, judgment is hereby rendered: Declaring the three (3) affidavits of sale as null and void and no effect; Ordering the plaintiffs in Civil Case No. 591 and defendants in Civil Case No. 1056, namely Sabdullah Mama, Presentation Romero-Mama Gloriosa Romero Rasonable, Meliton Pacas and Lucita Romero to surrender and to deliver to Lutero Romero the possession of all the portions of Lot 23, Pls-35; Ordering the Municipal Assessor of Kapatagan, Lanao del Norte to cancel Tax Declaration Nos.
WHEREFORE, judgment is hereby rendered: Declaring the three (3) affidavits of sale as null and void and no effect; Ordering the plaintiffs in Civil Case No. 591 and defendants in Civil Case No. 1056, namely Sabdullah Mama, Presentation Romero-Mama Gloriosa Romero Rasonable, Meliton Pacas and Lucita Romero to surrender and to deliver to Lutero Romero the possession of all the portions of Lot 23, Pls-35; Ordering the Municipal Assessor of Kapatagan, Lanao del Norte to cancel Tax Declaration Nos. 6029, 6030, 6031 and 6032 in the names of defendants (Civil Case No.1056) Sabdullah Mama, Gloriosa Rasonable, plaintiff Lutero Romero and defendant Meliton Pacas and to restore Tax Declaration No. 1347 in the name of Lutero Romero for the entire Lot 23, Pls-35; Ordering the defendants (Civil Case No. 1056) to pay to the plaintiff the sum of TEN THOUSAND (P10,000.00) PESOS as actual damages; Ordering the defendants (Civil Case no. 1056) to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of TEN THOUSAND (P10,000.00) Pesos as moral damages; and Ordering the defendants (Civil Case No. 1056) to pay the cost of this proceeding. SO ORDERED.
EXPECTACION DECLARO, CONSOLACION DEGALA, DIONISIO DELLOMOS, PRENIAS DELLOMOS, APOLINARIO DELLOMOS, LUDOVICO DEGALA, ORTENCIA COMORRO DANGDANG, ROSALIA COMORRO, FORTUNATO DEGALA, OLYMPIA DEGALA, AND ULPIANO DECLARO, VS. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS THIRD DIVISION, FELOMINO COMORRO, ALTESIMA COMORRO, CEF
G.R. No. 119747 -
CaseG.R. No. 228854 -
G.R. No. 228854 -
CaseMERCED (NEE MACATANGAY) AND MARIA OLIVIA M. PAREDES, VS. GOVERNMENT
G.R. No. 140398 -