Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED. The Court of Appeals’ Resolution dated May 29, 2001 and Resolution dated August 29, 2001 are AFFIRMED. Costs against petitioners. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED. The Court of Appeals Resolution dated May 29, 2001 and Resolution dated August 29, 2001 are AFFIRMED. Costs against petitioners. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 198402 - HEIRS OF PACENCIA RACAZA, NAMELY, VIRGINIA RACAZA COSCOS, ANGELES RACAZA MIEL, RODRIGO RACAZA, QUIRINO RACAZA, ROGELIO RACAZA, ERNESTA RACAZA AND ROLAND RACAZA, VS. SPOUSES FLORENCIO ABAY-ABAY, AND ELEUTERIA ABAY-ABAY,[1].R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 198402 -
CaseG.R. NO. 155066 - HEIRS OF THE DECEASED PEDRO AVENDAÑO, NAMELY, MA. ROSELLE C. AVENDAÑO, RAINIER C. AVENDAÑO, ROMMEL C. AVENDAÑO, JOANNA C. AVENDAÑO AND MA. HANNAH AVENDAÑO-ARCEO, AND THE HEIRS OF THE DECEASED MICHAEL C. AVENDAÑO, REPRESENTED BY ALEXANDER AVENDAÑO, VS. DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIP
G.R. NO. 155066 -
CaseG.R. NO. 156894 - GUILLERMO A. CRUZ, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS (FORMER FIFTEENTH DIVISION); REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, THIRD JUDICIAL REGION, BRANCH 38, LINGAYEN, PANGASINAN; SALVADOR C. VALLE AND CARMENCITA S. VALLE.
G.R. NO. 156894 -