Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , in view of the foregoing, we hereby find respondent GUILTY of gross misconduct. As he has already retired from the service and thus could no longer be dismissed nor suspended, we hereby order that a FINE of P40,000.00 be imposed upon him, to be deducted from his retirement benefits. Further, he is hereby barred from any employment in all branches of the government including government-owned and -controlled corporations.
WHEREFORE , in view of the foregoing, we hereby find respondent GUILTY of gross misconduct. As he has already retired from the service and thus could no longer be dismissed nor suspended, we hereby order that a FINE of P40,000.00 be imposed upon him, to be deducted from his retirement benefits. Further, he is hereby barred from any employment in all branches of the government including government-owned and -controlled corporations. SO ORDERED.
A.M. No. MTJ-15-1854 [Formerly A.M. No. 14-4-50-MCTC] - OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, COMPLAINANT, VS. PRESIDING JUDGE BILL D. BUYUCAN AND CLERK OF COURT GERARD N. LINDAWAN, BOTH AT MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT, BAGABAG-DIADI, NUEVA VIZCAYA.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. MTJ-15-1854
CaseA.M. NO. RTJ-03-1780 (FORMERLY OCA IPI NO. 03-1709-RTJ) - AMADO L. DE LEON, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE PATROCINIO R. CORPUZ, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 44, SAN FERNANDO CITY, PAMPANGA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. NO. RTJ-03-1780
CaseA.M. No. P-14-3194 (Formerly A.M. No. 14-1-01-MTC) - OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, COMPLAINANT, VS. CONSTANTINO P. REDOÑA, FORMER CLERK OF COURT II, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, TANAUAN, LEYTE.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. P-14-3194