Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 256021 -

G.R. No. 256021 - RURAL BANK OF SAN MATEO ISABELA, INC., REPRESENTED BY KATRINA MARIE PILAPIL IN HER CAPACITY AS CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, VS. MYRVIN A. RAMALES AND JOSIE A. RAMALES.

View Original SourceCompare
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered, the affirmative defense is denied, as well as the motion to dismiss. Instead, petitioners are given fifteen (15) days from notice to amend their petition; otherwise, their petition may be dismissed. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered, the affirmative defense is denied, as well as the motion to dismiss. Instead, petitioners are given fifteen (15) days from notice to amend their petition; otherwise, their petition may be dismissed. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. No. 179781 - SPOUSES BASILIO AND NORMA HILAGA, VS. RURAL BANK OF ISULAN (COTABATO, INC., AS REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER). D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 179781 -

Case

G.R. NO. 164876 - LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. LEONILA P. CELADA.

G.R. NO. 164876 -