Accordingly, a Writ of Possession [16] was issued by the RTC. The Decision granting the issuance of a writ of possession became final on August 11, 2022 as per the Entry of Final Judgment [17] dated August 16, 2022. Accordingly, the subject writ of possession had been duly satisfied and implemented as per the Sheriffs Final Report [18] dated September 13, 2022. On September 9, 2022, Castañeda filed before the RTC of Quezon City an Entry of Appearance with Manifestation and Very Urgent Motion to Recall Writ of Possession [19] claiming that he is the owner and possessor of the parking slot covered by CCT No. 004-2011006807. He alleged that he bought the parking space from Goldland as evidenced by the Reservation Agreement [20] and Acknowledgment [21] both dated September 28, 2013, showing his full-payment of the purchase price thereof in the sum of PHP 700,000.00. On September 12, 2018, Goldland executed a Deed of Absolute Sale [22] over the subject parking space in favor of Castañeda. In the said deed, Goldland expressly declared that the parking lot was "free from any lien or encumbrances, whatsoever, except those contained in the 'Master Deed with Declarations and Restrictions' of Portovita Condominium." [23] Castañeda also averred that Goldland never disclosed any prior mortgage or encumbrance over the subject property. [24] After the execution of the Deed of Absolute Sale, Goldland paid the transfer tax for the supposed transfer of the title of the subject parking lot in the name of Castañeda with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). [25] On August 12, 2017, the parking space had been turned over to Castañeda. [26] Since then, he had been in actual and constructive possession of the same by regularly using it as parking space for his vehicle. Moreover, he started paying the corresponding association dues and realty taxes thereon. [27] However, Goldland failed to deliver the corresponding CCT to Castañeda despite regular follow ups and notwithstanding his full payment of the purchase price. [28] To his surprise, Castañeda was notified by Portovita Condominium Association, Inc. through a letter dated September 5, 2022, that the parking lot was the subject of a writ of possession and notice to vacate issued by the Quezon City RTC and the Sheriff, respectively. This prompted Castañeda to file the instant motion to recall the writ of possession insofar as the subject property is concerned invoking the last sentence of Rule 39, Section 33 of the Revised Rules of Court. He averred that he is a purchaser in good faith and for value, and that he has a better right over the subject parking lot having been in actual and constructive possession thereof from the moment it was turned over to him on August 12, 2017. [29] Ruling of the Regional Trial Court In the first assailed Order, [30] the trial court denied Castañeda's motion to recall the writ of possession for being moot and academic. The Motion for Reconsideration was likewise denied by the trial cou