accordingly, recommended her suspension from the practice of law for two months. Respondent's subsequent Motion for Reconsideration was denied by the IBP Board of Governors in a Resolution dated September 20, 2008. [3] Thereafter, sometime in January 2017, respondent filed a Complaint for deportation (as Undesirable Alien) against complainant before the Bureau of Immigration (BI). Subsequently, on April 17, 2017, an apparent altercation occurred between respondent and complainant's son/respondent's nephew, Jean Marc. Because of these incidents, complainant filed the instant Complaint for disbarment against respondent. [4] Particularly, complainant charged respondent with attempted murder and with violating the Lawyer's Oath, as well as Rules 1.01 and 1.02 of Canon 1 of the CPR for allegedly ordering the responding police officers during the incident on April 17, 2017 to shoot or kill Jean Marc, respondent's nephew. Complainant likewise charged respondent with violating Canon 15, Rule 15.03 of the CPR for representing conflicting interests in connection with the deportation case she filed against the former. In this respect, complainant claimed that respondent used information previously obtained when she, through her law firm, was a counsel for the Drilling & Blasting Management Group, Inc., of which Rebecca was the President, albeit, complainant did not clarify his exact relation to the said company. [5] Finally, complainant asserted that respondent continues to use abusive and offensive language in her pleadings despite the previous sanction and warning given by the Court in A.C. No. 10556, in violation of Canon 8, Rule 8.01 of the CPR. [6] In defense, respondent denied all the allegations against her and claimed that the previous case against her, A.C. No. 10556, is still pending before the Court. [7] The IBP Proceedings In a Report and Recommendation [8] dated September 13, 2019, the IBP Investigating Commissioner (IC) found respondent guilty of employing offensive and improper language in her pleadings and, accordingly, recommended that respondent be admonished, with a stern warning that a repetition of the same or similar offense shall be dealt with more severely. [9] The IBP-IC found respondent administratively liable for violating Canon 1, Rule 1.0 of the CPR and the Lawyer's Oath for repeatedly urging the police officers to shoot her nephew, Jean Marc, during the April 17, 2017 incident. The IBP-IC, however, noted that when respondent ordered the same, she was under distress due to Jean Marc's actions and thus, betrayed the lack of any apparent intention on her part to commit a wrong. [10] In the same vein, the IBP-IC found respondent liable for violating Canon 8, Rule 8.01 of the CPR for using abusive and offensive words in her various submissions before the BI in the deportation case. [11] The foregoing notwithstanding, the IBP-IC found no merit in complainant's claim that respondent is guilty of representing conflicting interests in c